The selected claims differ
Simple’s source says no artificial colour or perfume but lists named flower oils,including Pelargonium Graveolens Flower Oil and Anthemis Nobilis Flower Oil. Faith’s maker page explicitly says fragrance-free and free from essential oils. These are not identical statements,and neither is converted here into a universal no-reaction promise.
Read the actual list
A short marketing phrase can help identify a product but should not replace the full current ingredient field. If a buyer has a specific ingredient requirement,the actual selected label and maker clarification are more useful than assuming every sensitive or gentle product excludes the same materials.
A practical replacement example
Suppose a buyer liked the idea of no artificial perfume and then realises the requirement was actually no essential oils. The selected Simple statement alone does not fulfil that stricter brief. Faith’s explicit source claim is relevant to investigate,but the received current formula and personal suitability still need to be checked. This is a requirement comparison,not a recommendation that one product cannot cause irritation.
Do not invent a scent test
We have not opened,smelled or used the selected products. A fragrance-free claim is recorded as source information,not a claim that the liquid has no detectable raw-material odour or that every user will perceive it identically. Consumer reviews about scent or reactions are not reused as this site’s experience.
Keep the warning visible
Faith says stop use if irritation occurs,and both cosmetic sources provide eye-contact precautions. These warnings remain relevant despite gentle or fragrance-free positioning. If a suitability question is personal or medical,use an appropriate qualified source rather than a website ingredient lookup. Independent clinical/chemical/content review remains pending.
A concrete decision record
A fragrance requirement should say whether it concerns artificial perfume,any added fragrance or named essential oils. Simple’s no-artificial-perfume positioning appears beside two flower-oil names,while Faith explicitly claims fragrance-free and essential-oil-free. Keep those separate source statements instead of giving both products an identical fragrance checkbox.
Sources & scope
Checked November 5, 2026. Manufacturer and retailer references support the specific statements. Dated displayed prices are not final checkout quotes, performance rankings or performance testing. This shopping reference does not replace the exact product label or retailer instructions. Current received labels and independent clinical/chemical/content/commerce review remain pending.
Boots Simple400ml selected redirect10375990/8219443 ↗
Faith In Nature400ml one-time manufacturer record ↗
Boots Nizoral2%w/w60ml10025089/2695103 ↗
Keep reading
What can I learn from the current ingredient list? ↗
Does SLS/SLES-free mean the formula contains no sulfate ingredient? ↗
What do natural and dermatologically-tested claims establish? ↗